Hi,
Am 06.01.2016 um 00:40 schrieb Nishanth Menon [off-list ref]:
On 01/05/2016 06:01 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
quoted
tested on OMP5432 EVM
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
index 5cf76a1..30c0d3b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi
#clock-cells = <0>;
};
+ rtc {
+ compatible = "ti,palmas-rtc";
+ interrupt-parent = <&palmas>;
+ interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
IRQ_TYPE_NONE is not correct here -> it should have some polarity - if
it had none, there'd be no interrupt, right?
Well, it just translates IRQ_TYPE_NONE through
Linux/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h
to
interrupts = <8 0>;
which is given as an example in
Documentation//devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt
Since I don't know anything about the rtc driver beyond the bindings documentation I assume it is correct...
I have added Laxman Dewangan because he introduced this interrupts = <8 0>;
quoted
+ ti,backup-battery-chargeable;
+ ti,backup-battery-charge-high-current;
+ };
+
palmas_pmic {
compatible = "ti,palmas-pmic";
interrupt-parent = <&palmas>;
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
BR,
Nikolaus