Hi Guenter,


On 22 May 2015 at 23:05, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:38:32PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:

quoted

Hi Guenter.

Sorry for my poor English .
let me explain this :

On 22 May 2015 at 21:23, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 05/22/2015 03:46 AM, Fu Wei wrote:

quoted

Hi Timo,

[ ... ]

quoted

So I am still trying to improve pretimeout support :-)

Is there anything still missing from it ?

quoted

If I can make pretimeout merged, may be you can try pretimeout to
implement early_timeout_sec function?

Not sure how one would or even could do that.

Do you mean "implement early_pretimeout_sec", by any chance ?

I mean: using pretimeout to implement the function you want, instead
of early_pretimeout_sec

How would this work if the watchdog hardware doesn't support pretimeout ?

Pretimeout and early timeout are two logically different functions, with
different goals, so I don't entirely (if at all) understand why it would
make sense to tie them together.

Can you elaborate why you think this would be a good idea ?

sorry,  my apology.  forget about this, :-)
I think we should focus on SBSA watchdog patch here, but not a
early_timeout_sec.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021