Thread (108 messages) 108 messages, 7 authors, 2015-05-25

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] Watchdog: introduce "pretimeout" into framework

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: 2015-05-22 15:06:00
Also in: linux-watchdog, lkml

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:38:32PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Guenter.

Sorry for my poor English .
let me explain this :

On 22 May 2015 at 21:23, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 05/22/2015 03:46 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
quoted
Hi Timo,
[ ... ]
quoted
So I am still trying to improve pretimeout support :-)

Is there anything still missing from it ?
quoted
If I can make pretimeout merged, may be you can try pretimeout to
implement early_timeout_sec function?

Not sure how one would or even could do that.

Do you mean "implement early_pretimeout_sec", by any chance ?
I mean: using pretimeout to implement the function you want, instead
of early_pretimeout_sec
How would this work if the watchdog hardware doesn't support pretimeout ?

Pretimeout and early timeout are two logically different functions, with
different goals, so I don't entirely (if at all) understand why it would
make sense to tie them together.

Can you elaborate why you think this would be a good idea ?

Thanks,
Guenter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help