Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 17/19] DT: Add documentation for exynos4-is 'flashes' property
From: Jacek Anaszewski <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-22 08:47:12
Also in:
linux-leds, linux-media, lkml
Hi, On 01/21/2015 05:32 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi, On 09/01/15 16:23, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:quoted
This patch adds a description of 'flashes' property to the samsung-fimc.txt. Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <redacted> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>quoted
--- .../devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt index 922d6f8..22a6b2f 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung-fimc.txt@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ should be inactive. For the "active-a" state the camera port A must be activated and the port B deactivated and for the state "active-b" it should be the other way around. +Optional properties: + +- flashes - Array of phandles to flash LED devices, or their sub-nodes + representing sub-leds. + (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt)How about renaming this to "illuminators" or something else more generic? The "torch" LED (for video recording illumination?) is not really a flash.
OK, currently I can't think of a better substitute for 'illuminators'. Since it has been agreed that a discrete LED component requires a child node in a LED device binding, even if there is only one current output exposed by the LED device, this description has to be modified as follows: - illuminators - Array of phandles to the child nodes of a flash LED device related binding. (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt). -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski