Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-03

Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: af_alg - use DIV_ROUND_UP helper macro for calculations

flat view

From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2021-05-26 08:31:45
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:37:44AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Wu Bo [off-list ref] a écrit :
quoted
From: Wu Bo <redacted>

Replace open coded divisor calculations with the DIV_ROUND_UP kernel
macro for better readability.

Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <redacted>
---
 crypto/af_alg.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/crypto/af_alg.c b/crypto/af_alg.c
index 18cc82d..8bd288d 100644
--- a/crypto/af_alg.c
+++ b/crypto/af_alg.c
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ int af_alg_make_sg(struct af_alg_sgl *sgl, struct
iov_iter *iter, int len)
 	if (n < 0)
 		return n;

-	npages = (off + n + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(off + n, PAGE_SIZE);
You should use PFN_UP()
No. We are not using pfns here - we're converting a byte count to a
page count.

Besides, "PFN_UP" is a horrible, awful api. It does not decribe what
it does and anyone who is not a mm developer will look at it and ask
"what <the ....> does this do?" and have to go looking for it's
definition to determine what it does. Yes, that's exactyl what I've
just done, and I really wish I didn't because, well, it just
reinforces how much we suck at APIs...

OTOH, what DIV_ROUND_UP() does is obvious, widely understood, self
documenting and easy to determine if the usage is correct, which
indeed this is.

The lesson: do not use whacky obscure, out of context macros when a
simple, obvious, widely known macro will give the same result and
make the code easier to understand.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help