Thread (239 messages) 239 messages, 19 authors, 2022-09-19

Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 00/45] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: 2021-11-22 21:34:18
Also in: kvm, linux-crypto, linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
On 11/22/21 1:14 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
quoted
On 11/22/21 11:06 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
quoted
quoted
3. Kernel accesses guest private memory via a kernel mapping.  This one
    is tricky.  These probably *do* result in a panic() today, but
    ideally shouldn't.
KVM has defined some helper functions to maps and unmap the guest pages.
Those helper functions do the GPA to PFN lookup before calling the
kmap(). Those helpers are enhanced such that it check the RMP table
before the kmap() and acquire a lock to prevent a page state change
until the kunmap() is called. So, in the current implementation, we
should *not* see a panic() unless there is a KVM driver bug that didn't
use the helper functions or a bug in the helper function itself.
I don't think this is really KVM specific.

Think of a remote process doing ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER) or pretty much
any generic get_user_pages() instance.  As long as the memory is mapped
into the page tables, you're exposed to users that walk the page tables.

How do we, for example, prevent ptrace() from inducing a panic()?
In the current approach, this access will induce a panic(). In general,
supporting the ptrace() for the encrypted VM region is going to be
difficult.
But ptrace() is just an example, any path in the kernel that accesses a gup'd
page through a kernel mapping will explode if handed a guest private page.
The upcoming TDX work to unmap the guest memory region from the current process
page table can easily extend for the SNP to cover the current limitations.
That represents an ABI change though.  If KVM allows userspace to create SNP guests
without any guarantees that userspace cannot coerce the kernel into accessing guest
private memory, then we are stuck supporting that behavior even if KVM later gains
the ability to provide such guarantees through new APIs.

If allowing this behavior was only a matter of the system admin opting into a
dangerous configuration, I would probably be ok merging SNP with it buried behind
EXPERT or something scarier, but this impacts KVM's ABI as well as kernel internals,
e.g. the hooks in kvm_vcpu_map() and friends are unnecessary if KVM can differentiate
between shared and private gfns in its memslots, as gfn_to_pfn() will either fail or
point at memory that is guaranteed to be in the shared state.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help