Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-07-08 20:23:28
Also in:
linux-ide, linux-scsi, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2018-05-24 · Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- 2018-05-23 · Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI · Kees Cook <hidden>
- 2018-05-23 · Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
- 2018-05-22 · Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- 2018-05-22 · [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI · Kees Cook <hidden>
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:06:59AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 03:14:19PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:quoted
Ugh, so that would necessitate a change there too. As I said before, I don't really care where it lives. I know the SCSI folks seem bothered by moving it, but in reality, it's not like this stuff will likely ever really change. Of the two choices (select entire SCSI stack, or just move this little bit), I know what I would consider the saner option...Oh well. How about something like this respin of Kees' series? http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/sense-cleanupDoes the CONFIG_PCMCIA in drivers/scsi/Makefile now get exposed in weird config cases? Otherwise, yeah, looks good to me. Thanks!
Btw, did you plan to resend the series with this and your changes applied?