Thread (72 messages) 72 messages, 4 authors, 2017-02-16

Re: [PATCH 7/8] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Date: 2017-02-02 05:20:17
Also in: lkml

On 02/01/2017 04:56 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
quoted
+/*
+ * add rq to rbtree and fifo
+ */
+static void dd_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
+			      bool at_head)
+{
+	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
+	struct deadline_data *dd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
+	const int data_dir = rq_data_dir(rq);
+
+	if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q, rq))
+		return;
+
A related doubt: shouldn't blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge be invoked
with the scheduler lock held too, as blk_mq_sched_try_merge, to
protect (at least) q->last_merge?

In bfq this function is invoked with the lock held.
It doesn't matter which lock you use, as long as:

1) You use the same one consistently
2) It has the same scope as the queue lock (the one you call the
   scheduler lock)

mq-deadline sets up a per-queue structure, deadline_data, and it has a
lock embedded in that structure. This is what mq-deadline uses to
serialize access to its data structures, as well as those in the queue
(like last_merge).

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help