Re: [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq-scheduling framework
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Date: 2016-12-22 17:12:42
Also in:
lkml
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Date: 2016-12-22 17:12:42
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:quoted
This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I didn't see a solution to that problem.Hello Omar, Can you clarify your comment? Since my patches initialize both tags->rqs[] and sched_tags->rqs[] the function blk_mq_tag_to_rq() should still work. Bart.
Sorry, you're right, it does work, but tags->rqs[] ends up being the extra lookup table. I suspect that the runtime overhead of keeping that up to date could be worse than copying the rq fields if you have lots of CPUs but only one hardware queue.