Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 5 authors, 2016-10-12

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] blk-mq: Introduce blk_quiesce_queue() and blk_resume_queue()

From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-05 19:05:48
Also in: linux-nvme, linux-rdma, linux-scsi

On 10/05/2016 11:14 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
Hello Ming,

Can you have a look at the attached patch? That patch uses an srcu read
lock for all queue types, whether or not the BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag has
been set. Additionally, I have dropped the QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCING flag.
Just like previous versions, this patch has been tested.
Hey Bart,

Do we care about the synchronization of queue_rq and/or
blk_mq_run_hw_queue of the hctx is not stopped?

I'm wandering if we can avoid introducing new barriers in the
submission path of its not absolutely needed.
Hello Sagi,

I'm not sure whether the new blk_quiesce_queue() function is useful 
without stopping all hardware contexts first. In other words, in my view 
setting BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag before calling blk_quiesce_queue() is 
sufficient and I don't think that a new QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCING flag is 
necessary.

Bart.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help