Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] blk-mq: Introduce blk_quiesce_queue() and blk_resume_queue()
From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-05 23:00:47
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-rdma, linux-scsi
From: Bart Van Assche <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-05 23:00:47
Also in:
linux-nvme, linux-rdma, linux-scsi
On 10/05/2016 03:49 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
We can use srcu read lock for BLOCKING and rcu read lock for non-BLOCKING, by putting *_read_lock() and *_read_unlock() into two wrappers, which should minimize the cost of srcu read lock & unlock and the code is still easy to read & verify.
Hello Ming, The lock checking algorithms in the sparse and smatch static checkers are unable to deal with code of the type "if (condition) (un)lock()". So unless someone has a better proposal my preference is to use the approach from the patch at the start of this e-mail thread. Thanks, Bart.