Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add support for CAMCC for Kaanapali
From: Taniya Das <hidden>
Date: 2025-09-26 07:09:31
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 9/25/2025 2:31 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 25/09/2025 09:46, Taniya Das wrote:quoted
quoted
BIST == Built In Self Test ? Can this not just be put into one camcc header ?These are two different clock controllers CAMCC and CAM_BIST_MCLK they should not be in the same header.BIST means Built In Self Test ?
Yes Bryan, this refers to the self test. However, the hardware does support functional clocks for the camera MCLK.
Is this really something to be upstreamed ?
As this block supports the functional mclks we need them to be upstreamed. -- Thanks, Taniya Das