Re: [RFC PATCH 10/36] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Date: 2025-07-23 16:39:22
Also in:
lkml
Hi James, Jonathan, On 7/16/25 18:07, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:36:22 +0000 James Morse [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add code to parse the arm64 specific MPAM table, looking up the cache level from the PPTT and feeding the end result into the MPAM driver.Throw in a link to the spec perhaps? Particularly useful to know which version this was written against when reviewing it.
As I comment below this code checks the table revision is 1 and so we can assume it was written against version 2 of the spec. As of Monday, there is a new version hot off the press, https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0065/3-0bet/?lang=en which introduces an "MMIO size" field to allow for disabled nodes. This should be considered here to avoid advertising msc that aren't present.
quoted
CC: Carl Worth <redacted> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig | 3 + drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile | 1 + drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c | 365 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/acpi/tables.c | 2 +- include/linux/arm_mpam.h | 46 +++++ 6 files changed, 417 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c create mode 100644 include/linux/arm_mpam.hquoted
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile index 05ecde9eaabe..27b872249baa 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile@@ -6,5 +6,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT) += gtdt.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_IORT) += iort.o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE) += cpuidle.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_AMBA) += amba.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_MPAM) += mpam.oKeep it with the ACPI ones? There doesn't seem to be a lot of order in here though so I guess maybe there is logic behind putting it here I'm missing.quoted
obj-y += dma.o init.o obj-y += thermal_cpufreq.odiff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f4791bac9a2a --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// Copyright (C) 2025 Arm Ltd. + +/* Parse the MPAM ACPI table feeding the discovered nodes into the driver */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI MPAM: " fmt + +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/arm_mpam.h> +#include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +#include <acpi/processor.h> + +/* Flags for acpi_table_mpam_msc.*_interrupt_flags */References.. I'm looking at 3.0-alpha table 5 to check this. I can see why you might be reluctant to point at an alpha if that is what you are using ;)quoted
+#define ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_MODE_EDGE 1 +#define ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_TYPE_MASK (3 << 1)GENMASK(3, 2) would be my preference for how to do masks in new code.quoted
+#define ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_TYPE_WIRED 0 +#define ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER BIT(3) +#define ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_VALID BIT(4) + +static bool frob_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, int intid, u32 flags, + int *irq, u32 processor_container_uid) +{ + int sense; + + if (!intid) + return false; + + /* 0 in this field indicates a wired interrupt */ + if (flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_TYPE_MASK)I'd prefer more explicit code (and probably no comment) if (FIELD_GET(flags, ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_TYPE_MASK) != ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_TYPE_WIRED) return false;quoted
+ return false; + + if (flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_MODE_EDGE) + sense = ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE; + else + sense = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;If the spec is supposed to be using standard ACPI_* types for this field (I don't think the connection is explicitly documented though) then sense = FIELD_GET(flags, ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_MODE_MASK); Assuming a change to define the mask and rely on the ACPI defs for the values This one is entirely up to you.quoted
+ + /* + * If the GSI is in the GIC's PPI range, try and create a partitioned + * percpu interrupt. + */ + if (16 <= intid && intid < 32 && processor_container_uid != ~0) { + pr_err_once("Partitioned interrupts not supported\n"); + return false; + } + + *irq = acpi_register_gsi(&pdev->dev, intid, sense, ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH); + if (*irq <= 0) { + pr_err_once("Failed to register interrupt 0x%x with ACPI\n", + intid); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +static void acpi_mpam_parse_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *tbl_msc, + struct resource *res, int *res_idx) +{ + u32 flags, aff = ~0; + int irq; + + flags = tbl_msc->overflow_interrupt_flags; + if (flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_VALID && + flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER) + aff = tbl_msc->overflow_interrupt_affinity;Just to make the two cases look the same I'd do else aff = ~0; here as well and not initialize above. It's not quite worth using a helper function for these two identical blocks but it's close.quoted
+ if (frob_irq(pdev, tbl_msc->overflow_interrupt, flags, &irq, aff)) { + res[*res_idx].start = irq; + res[*res_idx].end = irq; + res[*res_idx].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ; + res[*res_idx].name = "overflow";res[*res_idx] = DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(irq, 1, "overflow");quoted
+ + (*res_idx)++;Can roll this in as well.quoted
+ } + + flags = tbl_msc->error_interrupt_flags; + if (flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_VALID && + flags & ACPI_MPAM_MSC_IRQ_AFFINITY_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER) + aff = tbl_msc->error_interrupt_affinity; + else + aff = ~0; + if (frob_irq(pdev, tbl_msc->error_interrupt, flags, &irq, aff)) { + res[*res_idx].start = irq; + res[*res_idx].end = irq; + res[*res_idx].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ; + res[*res_idx].name = "error";Similar to above.quoted
+ + (*res_idx)++; + } +} +quoted
+static bool __init parse_msc_pm_link(struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *tbl_msc, + struct platform_device *pdev, + u32 *acpi_id) +{ + bool acpi_id_valid = false; + struct acpi_device *buddy; + char hid[16], uid[16]; + int err; + + memset(&hid, 0, sizeof(hid)); + memcpy(hid, &tbl_msc->hardware_id_linked_device, + sizeof(tbl_msc->hardware_id_linked_device)); + + if (!strcmp(hid, ACPI_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER_HID)) { + *acpi_id = tbl_msc->instance_id_linked_device; + acpi_id_valid = true; + } + + err = snprintf(uid, sizeof(uid), "%u", + tbl_msc->instance_id_linked_device); + if (err < 0 || err >= sizeof(uid))Does snprintf() ever return < 0 ? It's documented as returning number of chars printed (without the NULL) so that can only be 0 or greater. Can it return >= sizeof(uid) ? Looks odd. + return acpi_id_valid;quoted
+ + buddy = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(hid, uid, -1); + if (buddy) + device_link_add(&pdev->dev, &buddy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); + + return acpi_id_valid; +}quoted
+static int __init _parse_table(struct acpi_table_header *table) +{ + char *table_end, *table_offset = (char *)(table + 1); + struct property_entry props[4]; /* needs a sentinel */ + struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *tbl_msc; + int next_res, next_prop, err = 0; + struct acpi_device *companion; + struct platform_device *pdev; + enum mpam_msc_iface iface; + struct resource res[3]; + char uid[16]; + u32 acpi_id; + + table_end = (char *)table + table->length; + + while (table_offset < table_end) { + tbl_msc = (struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *)table_offset; + table_offset += tbl_msc->length; + + /* + * If any of the reserved fields are set, make no attempt to + * parse the msc structure. This will prevent the driver from + * probing all the MSC, meaning it can't discover the system + * wide supported partid and pmg ranges. This avoids whatever + * this MSC is truncating the partids and creating a screaming + * error interrupt. + */ + if (tbl_msc->reserved || tbl_msc->reserved1 || tbl_msc->reserved2) + continue; + + if (decode_interface_type(tbl_msc, &iface)) + continue; + + next_res = 0; + next_prop = 0; + memset(res, 0, sizeof(res)); + memset(props, 0, sizeof(props)); + + pdev = platform_device_alloc("mpam_msc", tbl_msc->identifier); + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {returns NULL in at least some error cases (probably all, I'm just to lazy to check)quoted
+ err = PTR_ERR(pdev); + break; + } + + if (tbl_msc->length < sizeof(*tbl_msc)) { + err = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + /* Some power management is described in the namespace: */ + err = snprintf(uid, sizeof(uid), "%u", tbl_msc->identifier); + if (err > 0 && err < sizeof(uid)) { + companion = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev("ARMHAA5C", uid, -1); + if (companion) + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&pdev->dev, companion); + } + + if (iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) { + res[next_res].name = "MPAM:MSC"; + res[next_res].start = tbl_msc->base_address; + res[next_res].end = tbl_msc->base_address + tbl_msc->mmio_size - 1; + res[next_res].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + next_res++;DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED()?quoted
+ } else if (iface == MPAM_IFACE_PCC) { + props[next_prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("pcc-channel", + tbl_msc->base_address); + next_prop++; + } + + acpi_mpam_parse_irqs(pdev, tbl_msc, res, &next_res); + err = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, res, next_res); + if (err) + break; + + props[next_prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("arm,not-ready-us", + tbl_msc->max_nrdy_usec); + + /* + * The MSC's CPU affinity is described via its linked power + * management device, but only if it points at a Processor or + * Processor Container. + */ + if (parse_msc_pm_link(tbl_msc, pdev, &acpi_id)) { + props[next_prop++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("cpu_affinity", + acpi_id); + } + + err = device_create_managed_software_node(&pdev->dev, props, + NULL); + if (err) + break; + + /* Come back later if you want the RIS too */ + err = platform_device_add_data(pdev, tbl_msc, tbl_msc->length); + if (err) + break; + + platform_device_add(pdev);Can fail.quoted
+ } + + if (err) + platform_device_put(pdev); + + return err; +} + +static struct acpi_table_header *get_table(void) +{ + struct acpi_table_header *table; + acpi_status status; + + if (acpi_disabled || !system_supports_mpam()) + return NULL; + + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_MPAM, 0, &table); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return NULL; + + if (table->revision != 1) + return NULL;
Indicates that this was written against version 2 of the spec.
quoted
+ + return table; +} + +static int __init acpi_mpam_parse(void) +{ + struct acpi_table_header *mpam; + int err; + + mpam = get_table(); + if (!mpam) + return 0;Just what I was suggesting for the PPTT case in early patches. Nice :)quoted
+ + err = _parse_table(mpam); + acpi_put_table(mpam); + + return err; +} + +static int _count_msc(struct acpi_table_header *table) +{ + char *table_end, *table_offset = (char *)(table + 1); + struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *tbl_msc; + int ret = 0;Call it count as it only ever contains the count?quoted
+ + tbl_msc = (struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *)table_offset; + table_end = (char *)table + table->length; + + while (table_offset < table_end) { + if (tbl_msc->length < sizeof(*tbl_msc)) + return -EINVAL; + + ret++;count++ would feel more natural here.quoted
+ + table_offset += tbl_msc->length; + tbl_msc = (struct acpi_mpam_msc_node *)table_offset; + } + + return ret; +}That's all I have time for today. Will get to the rest of the series soonish. Jonathan
Thanks, Ben