RE: [PATCH v6 08/10] PCI: imx6: Use dwc common suspend resume method
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Date: 2024-11-25 08:44:33
Also in:
imx, linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <redacted> Sent: 2024年11月23日 0:47 To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> Cc: l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com; lpieralisi@kernel.org; kw@linux.com; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; Frank Li [off-list ref]; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; imx@lists.linux.dev; kernel@pengutronix.de; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] PCI: imx6: Use dwc common suspend resume method On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:00:44AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
quoted
-static void imx_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie) -{ - struct device *dev = imx_pcie->pci->dev; - - /* Some variants have a turnoff reset in DT */ - if (imx_pcie->turnoff_reset) { - reset_control_assert(imx_pcie->turnoff_reset); - reset_control_deassert(imx_pcie->turnoff_reset);Where these are handled in imx_pcie_pme_turn_off()? If you removed them intentionally for a reason, it should be mentioned in commitmessage.quoted
quoted
How about add the following descriptions into commit message? SRC interface is used to do the PME_TURN_OFF operations before. It's not veryWhat is SRC?
SRC is System Reset Control.
quoted
suitable. Now DWC common driver can do the PME_TURN_OFF kick off. Switch to this common methods, and remove the useless turnoff_resetmanipulate codes.quoted
Hmm, so 'turnoff_reset' is used to send PME_Turn_Off msg?
Yes, it is.
If so, then you need to say in such a way that the reader should understand 'turnoff_reset' was used to send PME_Turn_Off and since the DWC implementation is used, it is not needed now.
Okay. Thanks. Best Regards Richard Zhu
- Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்