Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 8 authors, 2022-10-11

Re: Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe v3 nodes to BPI-R2-Pro

From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
Date: 2022-09-04 15:28:37
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-phy, linux-rockchip, lkml

Hi,

Am Samstag, 27. August 2022, 11:14:28 CEST schrieb Frank Wunderlich:
quoted
Gesendet: Samstag, 27. August 2022 um 10:56 Uhr
Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref]
quoted
On 27/08/2022 11:50, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
quoted
Hi
quoted
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2022 um 08:50 Uhr
Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref]
On 25/08/2022 22:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
quoted
From: Frank Wunderlich <redacted>
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
index 93d383b8be87..40b90c052634 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,66 @@ vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
 		vin-supply = <&dc_12v>;
 	};

+	pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
Use consistent naming, so if other nodes have "regulator" suffix, use it
here as well.
only these 3 new have the suffix:

vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05-regulator
vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie-regulator
vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff-regulator

so i would drop it there...

so i end up with (including existing ones to compare):

vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys
vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys
pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9
pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8
vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05
vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie
vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff
vcc5v0_usb: vcc5v0_usb
vcc5v0_usb_host: vcc5v0-usb-host
vcc5v0_usb_otg: vcc5v0-usb-otg

is this ok?

maybe swap avdd* and pcie30 part to have voltage in front of function.
I prefer all of them have regulator suffix. I think reasonable is also
to rename the old ones and then add new ones with suffix.
ok, will change these to add -regulator in name (not label). and then rename the others in separate Patch outside of the series.

so basicly here
-       pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {
+       pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9-regulator {
-       pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8 {
+       pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8-regulator {

how about the swapping of pcie30 and the avddXvY? In Schematic they are named PCIE30_AVDD_0V9 / PCIE30_AVDD_1V8, so better leave this?

avdd0v9-pcie30 will be more similar to the other regulators, but inconsistent with Schematic.
now that the phy-driver changes got applied I'll just pick up the remaining
patches and do the node-name conversion while applying, so no need
to send another revision for it.

But of course feel free so send patches for converting the other regulator
names.

And I'm definitly preferring keeping close to schematic names :-)


Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help