Re: Aw: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe v3 nodes to BPI-R2-Pro
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
Date: 2022-09-04 15:28:37
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-phy, linux-rockchip, lkml
Hi, Am Samstag, 27. August 2022, 11:14:28 CEST schrieb Frank Wunderlich:
quoted
Gesendet: Samstag, 27. August 2022 um 10:56 Uhr Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref]quoted
On 27/08/2022 11:50, Frank Wunderlich wrote:quoted
Hiquoted
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2022 um 08:50 Uhr Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" [off-list ref] On 25/08/2022 22:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:quoted
From: Frank Wunderlich <redacted>quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts index 93d383b8be87..40b90c052634 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts@@ -86,6 +86,66 @@ vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys { vin-supply = <&dc_12v>; }; + pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 {Use consistent naming, so if other nodes have "regulator" suffix, use it here as well.only these 3 new have the suffix: vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05-regulator vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie-regulator vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff-regulator so i would drop it there... so i end up with (including existing ones to compare): vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8 vcc3v3_pi6c_05: vcc3v3-pi6c-05 vcc3v3_minipcie: vcc3v3-minipcie vcc3v3_ngff: vcc3v3-ngff vcc5v0_usb: vcc5v0_usb vcc5v0_usb_host: vcc5v0-usb-host vcc5v0_usb_otg: vcc5v0-usb-otg is this ok? maybe swap avdd* and pcie30 part to have voltage in front of function.I prefer all of them have regulator suffix. I think reasonable is also to rename the old ones and then add new ones with suffix.ok, will change these to add -regulator in name (not label). and then rename the others in separate Patch outside of the series. so basicly here - pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9 { + pcie30_avdd0v9: pcie30-avdd0v9-regulator { - pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8 { + pcie30_avdd1v8: pcie30-avdd1v8-regulator { how about the swapping of pcie30 and the avddXvY? In Schematic they are named PCIE30_AVDD_0V9 / PCIE30_AVDD_1V8, so better leave this? avdd0v9-pcie30 will be more similar to the other regulators, but inconsistent with Schematic.
now that the phy-driver changes got applied I'll just pick up the remaining patches and do the node-name conversion while applying, so no need to send another revision for it. But of course feel free so send patches for converting the other regulator names. And I'm definitly preferring keeping close to schematic names :-) Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel