On Sun, 26 Jun 2022, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
On 25.06.22 at 12:14, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
quoted
From: Lino Sanfilippo <redacted>
In uart_set_rs485_config() the serial core already assigns the passed
serial_rs485 struct to the uart port.
So remove the assignment in the drivers rs485_config() function to avoid
redundancy.
Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <redacted>
---
drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c
index ab2c5b2a1ce8..857e010d01dc 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c
@@ -591,7 +591,6 @@ static int ar933x_config_rs485(struct uart_port *port,
dev_err(port->dev, "RS485 needs rts-gpio\n");
return 1;
}
- port->rs485 = *rs485conf;
return 0;
}
Hmm, I realize that for some reason I missed cleaning up this particular
driver after introducing the serial_rs485 sanitization. It shouldn't need
that preceeding if block either because ar933x_no_rs485 gets applied if
there's no rts_gpiod so the core clears SER_RS485_ENABLED.
I think we still need that "if" in case that RS485 was not enabled at driver
startup (no rs485-enabled-at-boot-time) and no RTS GPIO was defined but then
RS485 is enabled via TIOCSRS485.
Maybe in ar933x_uart_probe()
if ((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
!up->rts_gpiod) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "lacking rts-gpio, disabling RS485\n");
port->rs485.flags &= ~SER_RS485_ENABLED;
port->rs485_supported = &ar933x_no_rs485;
}
should rather be
I think it would be better (and what I should have done while moving the
check there in the first place but I missed it). In addition, however, it
would be useful to not print unnecessarily:
if (!up->rts_gpiod) {
if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "lacking rts-gpio, disabling RS485\n");
port->rs485.flags &= ~SER_RS485_ENABLED;
}
port->rs485_supported = &ar933x_no_rs485;
}
--
i.