On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 02 November 2021 16:13:34 Pali Rohár wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday 02 November 2021 16:02:01 Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 11:00:34AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
But I do not have this hardware to verify it.
I still have a few Cobalt systems here.
Perfect! It would help if you could provide 'lspci -nn -vv' output from
that system. In case you have very old version of lspci on that system
you could try to run it with '-xxxx' (or '-xxx') which prints hexdump
and I can parse it with local lspci.
Thomas, one more question, do you have also GT-64115 system which has
PCI device id 0x4611? Based on Maciej quote, GT-64115 probably also
reports itself as "Memory controller" instead of "Host Bridge". So lspci
output from GT-64115 could be also interesting.
The only systems with GT64-xxx chips I have are Cobalt systems, but none of
them has a GT-64115 chip (Raq1 comes with GT-64011 and Raq2 with GT-64111).
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel