On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:41 AM Brad Larson [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Pensando Elba SoC platforms have a SPI connected CPLD
for platform management.
Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <redacted>
---
drivers/spi/spidev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
index 8cb4d923aeaa..8b285852ce82 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
@@ -683,6 +683,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id spidev_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "dh,dhcom-board" },
{ .compatible = "menlo,m53cpld" },
{ .compatible = "cisco,spi-petra" },
+ { .compatible = "pensando,cpld" },
{},
};
This does not seem appropriate, I think a platform management driver should
have a proper kernel abstraction instead of a user passthrough.
As mentioned elsewhere, it also needs to be way more specific. If this
is a programmable block, the compatible string might in fact need to
contain both a board identifier and a revision number for the programmable
logic, to ensure that the driver knows how to talk to it.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel