On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:18:52PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:

+/* Allocate or get existing MMU notifier for this {domain, mm} pair */
+static struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *
+arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_get(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+			  struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd;
+	struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(smmu_mn, &smmu_domain->mmu_notifiers, list) {
+		if (smmu_mn->mn.mm == mm) {
+			refcount_inc(&smmu_mn->refs);
+			return smmu_mn;
+		}
+	}
+
+	cd = arm_smmu_alloc_shared_cd(mm);
+	if (IS_ERR(cd))
+		return ERR_CAST(cd);
+
+	smmu_mn = kzalloc(sizeof(*smmu_mn), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!smmu_mn) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_free_cd;
+	}
+
+	refcount_set(&smmu_mn->refs, 1);
+	smmu_mn->cd = cd;
+	smmu_mn->domain = smmu_domain;
+	smmu_mn->mn.ops = &arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_ops;
+
+	ret = mmu_notifier_register(&smmu_mn->mn, mm);
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(smmu_mn);
+		goto err_free_cd;
+	}

I suppose this hasn't been applied yet, but someone asked me to look
at this series..

Why did you drop the change to mmu_notifier_get here? I'm strongly
trying to discourage static lists matching mm's like smmu_mn is
doing. This is handled by the core code, don't open code it..

Thanks,
Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel