RE: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-21 08:59:45
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-mm
Hi Jean,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Philippe Brucker Sent: 18 September 2020 11:19 To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com; Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted>; catalin.marinas@arm.com; Suzuki K Poulose [off-list ref]; robin.murphy@arm.com; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; will@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features Aggregate all sanity-checks for sharing CPU page tables with the SMMU under a single ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA bit. For PCIe SVA, users also need to check FEAT_ATS and FEAT_PRI. For platform SVA, they will have to check FEAT_STALLS. Introduce ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM (Broadcast TLB Maintenance), but don't enable it at the moment. Since the entire VMID space is shared with the CPU, enabling DVM (by clearing SMMU_CR2.PTM) could result in over-invalidation and affect performance of stage-2 mappings. Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> --- v10: * Check that 52-bit VA is supported on the SMMU side if vabits_actual requires it. * Check arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() instead of CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 10 +++++ .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.hb/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h index 90c08f156b43..7b14b48a26c7 100644--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h@@ -602,6 +602,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_device { #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE (1 << 13) #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_VAX (1 << 14) #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV (1 << 15) +#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM (1 << 16) +#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA (1 << 17) u32 features; #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH (1 << 0)@@ -683,4 +685,12 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(structarm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid, void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 asid); bool arm_smmu_free_asid(struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd); +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA +bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu); +#else /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */ +static inline bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + return false; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */ #endif /* _ARM_SMMU_V3_H */diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.cb/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c index ef3fcfa72187..cb94c0924196 100644--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c@@ -152,3 +152,48 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_shared_cd(structarm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd) kfree(cd); } } + +bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + unsigned long reg, fld; + unsigned long oas; + unsigned long asid_bits; + u32 feat_mask = ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM | ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
Why is BTM mandated for SVA? I couldn't find this requirement in SMMU spec (Sorry if I missed it or this got discussed earlier). But if performance is the only concern here, is it better just to allow it with a warning rather than limiting SMMUs without BTM? Thanks, Shameer
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ + if (vabits_actual == 52) + feat_mask |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_VAX; + + if ((smmu->features & feat_mask) != feat_mask) + return false; + + if (!(smmu->pgsize_bitmap & PAGE_SIZE)) + return false; + + /* + * Get the smallest PA size of all CPUs (sanitized by cpufeature). We're + * not even pretending to support AArch32 here. Abort if the MMU outputs + * addresses larger than what we support. + */ + reg = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1); + fld = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(reg, ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_SHIFT); + oas = id_aa64mmfr0_parange_to_phys_shift(fld); + if (smmu->oas < oas) + return false; + + /* We can support bigger ASIDs than the CPU, but not smaller */ + fld = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(reg, ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_SHIFT); + asid_bits = fld ? 16 : 8; + if (smmu->asid_bits < asid_bits) + return false; + + /* + * See max_pinned_asids in arch/arm64/mm/context.c. The following is + * generally the maximum number of bindable processes. + */ + if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) + asid_bits--; + dev_dbg(smmu->dev, "%d shared contexts\n", (1 << asid_bits) - + num_possible_cpus() - 2); + + return true; +}diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.cb/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index e99ebdd4c841..44c57bcfe112 100644--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c@@ -3257,6 +3257,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(structarm_smmu_device *smmu) smmu->ias = max(smmu->ias, smmu->oas); + if (arm_smmu_sva_supported(smmu)) + smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA; + dev_info(smmu->dev, "ias %lu-bit, oas %lu-bit (features 0x%08x)\n", smmu->ias, smmu->oas, smmu->features); return 0; -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel