Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 7 authors, 2021-01-06

RE: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features

From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-21 08:59:45
Also in: linux-iommu, linux-mm

Hi Jean,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of
Jean-Philippe Brucker
Sent: 18 September 2020 11:19
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com; Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted>;
catalin.marinas@arm.com; Suzuki K Poulose [off-list ref];
robin.murphy@arm.com; zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features

Aggregate all sanity-checks for sharing CPU page tables with the SMMU
under a single ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA bit. For PCIe SVA, users also need to
check FEAT_ATS and FEAT_PRI. For platform SVA, they will have to check
FEAT_STALLS.

Introduce ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM (Broadcast TLB Maintenance), but don't
enable it at the moment. Since the entire VMID space is shared with the
CPU, enabling DVM (by clearing SMMU_CR2.PTM) could result in
over-invalidation and affect performance of stage-2 mappings.

Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted>
---
v10:
* Check that 52-bit VA is supported on the SMMU side if vabits_actual
  requires it.
* Check arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() instead of
  CONFIG_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h   | 10 +++++
 .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c   | 45
+++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c   |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 90c08f156b43..7b14b48a26c7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -602,6 +602,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
 #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE	(1 << 13)
 #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_VAX		(1 << 14)
 #define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV		(1 << 15)
+#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM		(1 << 16)
+#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA		(1 << 17)
 	u32				features;

 #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH	(1 << 0)
@@ -683,4 +685,12 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct
arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
 void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 asid);
 bool arm_smmu_free_asid(struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA
+bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
+#else /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */
+static inline bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device
*smmu)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */
 #endif /* _ARM_SMMU_V3_H */
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
index ef3fcfa72187..cb94c0924196 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
@@ -152,3 +152,48 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_shared_cd(struct
arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd)
 		kfree(cd);
 	}
 }
+
+bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+	unsigned long reg, fld;
+	unsigned long oas;
+	unsigned long asid_bits;
+	u32 feat_mask = ARM_SMMU_FEAT_BTM |
ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
Why is BTM mandated for SVA? I couldn't find this requirement in SMMU spec
(Sorry if I missed it or this got discussed earlier). But if performance is the only concern here,
is it better just to allow it with a warning rather than limiting SMMUs without BTM?

Thanks,
Shameer
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	if (vabits_actual == 52)
+		feat_mask |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_VAX;
+
+	if ((smmu->features & feat_mask) != feat_mask)
+		return false;
+
+	if (!(smmu->pgsize_bitmap & PAGE_SIZE))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get the smallest PA size of all CPUs (sanitized by cpufeature). We're
+	 * not even pretending to support AArch32 here. Abort if the MMU
outputs
+	 * addresses larger than what we support.
+	 */
+	reg = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1);
+	fld = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(reg,
ID_AA64MMFR0_PARANGE_SHIFT);
+	oas = id_aa64mmfr0_parange_to_phys_shift(fld);
+	if (smmu->oas < oas)
+		return false;
+
+	/* We can support bigger ASIDs than the CPU, but not smaller */
+	fld = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(reg,
ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_SHIFT);
+	asid_bits = fld ? 16 : 8;
+	if (smmu->asid_bits < asid_bits)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * See max_pinned_asids in arch/arm64/mm/context.c. The following is
+	 * generally the maximum number of bindable processes.
+	 */
+	if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0())
+		asid_bits--;
+	dev_dbg(smmu->dev, "%d shared contexts\n", (1 << asid_bits) -
+		num_possible_cpus() - 2);
+
+	return true;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e99ebdd4c841..44c57bcfe112 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -3257,6 +3257,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct
arm_smmu_device *smmu)

 	smmu->ias = max(smmu->ias, smmu->oas);

+	if (arm_smmu_sva_supported(smmu))
+		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SVA;
+
 	dev_info(smmu->dev, "ias %lu-bit, oas %lu-bit (features 0x%08x)\n",
 		 smmu->ias, smmu->oas, smmu->features);
 	return 0;
--
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help