Re: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-15 07:34:17
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:quoted
On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. After these patches are applied, the build system no longer complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some changes in cpufreq.c there.It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next?Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had pm/linux-next :)
No problem. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel