Re: [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2020-07-15 02:49:58
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
-/** +/* * cpufreq_remove_dev - remove a CPU device
Because cpufreq_add_dev() is part of kernel doc, we better keep it.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
* * Removes the cpufreq interface for a CPU device.@@ -2373,6 +2374,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor); * cpufreq_get_policy - get the current cpufreq_policy * @policy: struct cpufreq_policy into which the current cpufreq_policy * is written + * @cpu: CPU to find the policy for * * Reads the current cpufreq policy. */@@ -2759,7 +2761,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_register_driver); -/** +/* * cpufreq_unregister_driver - unregister the current CPUFreq driver
And this should be there for sure.
* * Unregister the current CPUFreq driver. Only call this if you have -- 2.25.1
-- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel