Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] media: i2c: ov5645: Set maximum leverage of external clock frequency to 24480000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-03-19 08:00:52
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-media, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
Hi Laurent, On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:22 PM Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:41:57PM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:31 PM Prabhakar Mahadev Lad wrote:quoted
On 13 March 2020 21:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:12:33PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:quoted
While testing on Renesas RZ/G2E platform, noticed the clock frequency to be 24242424 as a result the probe failed. However increasing the maximum leverage of external clock frequency to 24480000 fixes this issue. Since this difference is small enough and is insignificant set the same in the driver. Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c index 4fbabf3..b49359b 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c@@ -1107,8 +1107,10 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client) } xclk_freq = clk_get_rate(ov5645->xclk); -/* external clock must be 24MHz, allow 1% tolerance */ -if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24240000) { +/* external clock must be 24MHz, allow a minimum 1% and amaximum of 2%quoted
+ * toleranceSo where do these numbers come from ? I understand that 2% is what you need to make your clock fit in the range, but why -1%/+2% instead of - 2%/+2% ? And why not 2.5 or 3% ? The sensor datasheet documents the range of supported xvclk frequencies to be 6MHz to 54MHz. I understand that PLL parameters depend on the clock frequency, but could they be calculated instead of hardcoded, to avoid requiring an exact 24MHz input frequency ?To be honest I don't have the datasheet for ov5645, the flyer says 6-54Mhz but the logs/comment says 24Mhz.Comparing to ov5640 datasheet [1] (which I am assuming might be similar to ov5645),Let's assume this to be the case, I see no reason not to :-)quoted
this change should affect the driver.How do you mean ?
Oops sorry for for the typo I meant shouldn't affect the driver :) Cheers, --Prabhakar
quoted
[1] https://cdn.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Sensors/LightImaging/OV5640_datasheet.pdfquoted
quoted
quoted
+ */ +if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24480000) { dev_err(dev, "external clock frequency %u is not supported\n", xclk_freq); return -EINVAL;-- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel