On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:15:25AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:24:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:31 PM H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The question is what "fix it" means. I'm really concerned about AC escapes,
and everyone else should be, too.
I do think that it might be the right thing to do to add some kind of
WARN_ON_ONCE() for AC being set in various can-reschedule situations.
So I disagree.
Either we set AC with preempt disabled, and then we don't need an extra
warning, because we already have a warning about scheduling with
preemption disabled, or we accept that the fault handler can run.
n/m about the faults, forgot the obvious :/
I still really dislike wrecking the preemption model over this.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel