[PATCH v2 02/16] arm64: dts: add sp804 timer node for Hi6220
From: Leo Yan <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-04 01:44:11
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Linus, Thanks for review. On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:23:42PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Guodong Xu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Leo Yan <redacted> Add sp804 timer for hi6220, so it can be used as broadcast timer. Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi index ad1f1eb..82c4756 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi@@ -209,5 +209,14 @@ clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; status = "disabled"; }; + + dual_timer0: dual_timer at f8008000 { + compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell"; + reg = <0x0 0xf8008000 0x0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&ao_ctrl 27>; + clock-names = "apb_pclk";How can this work? You only give the apb_pclk for clocking the bus to the timer. Most platforms using this driver has something like this: timer01: timer at 10104000 { compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell"; reg = <0x10104000 0x1000>; interrupt-parent = <&intc_dc1176>; interrupts = <0 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <0 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&timclk>, <&timclk>, <&pclk>; clock-names = "timer1", "timer2", "apb_pclk"; }; It then reads the two clocks in the beginning of clocks() to determine the frequency of each timer. By chance the code in the driver will allow just one clock and will then assume that both the bus to the timer and the timer itself is clocked from the same clock. But I highly doubt that this is the case.
This patch has been sent out for review previously [1]; So I refered other platforms and changed to only enable apb bus clock due I have not found timer enabling bits in Hi6220's spec.
Please verify what clocks actually goes into this timer, it should nominally be three of them.
Yes, it can work well even I don't enable any timer clock. I will check furthermore in spec to see if can bind with formal way as your suggestion. [1] http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20151009.131015.687ed525.en.html Thanks, Leo Yan