[PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example

Am 08.03.2016 um 09:54 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas F?rber [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.

Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt

@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes:

        gpio_keys {

While at it, I was told the preferred node naming would be dashes, not
underscores. The deeper we dig, the more we find.

quoted

                        compatible = "gpio-keys";
-                       #address-cells = <1>;
-                       #size-cells = <0>;
                        autorepeat;

Also a white line here may be optically more pleasant.

quoted

                        button at 21 {

FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd":
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button at 21 has a unit
name, but no reg property

My v2 GeekBox patch did have *-cells and a reg property, but Julien
asked I drop that: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8246481/

Are you suggesting we should add a reg property here and drop this patch
or go with this patch but follow up to not use @21?

quoted

                                label = "GPIO Key UP";

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)