[PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example
From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven)
Date: 2016-03-08 08:54:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-input, linux-rockchip, lkml
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas F?rber [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices. Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes: gpio_keys { compatible = "gpio-keys"; - #address-cells = <1>; - #size-cells = <0>; autorepeat; button at 21 {
FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd": (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button at 21 has a unit name, but no reg property
label = "GPIO Key UP";
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds