On Tuesday 16 February 2016 01:08:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:

On Monday 15 February 2016 22:16:50 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

The Renesas R-Car System Controller provides power management for the
CPU cores and various coprocessors, following the generic PM domain
bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.

This supports R-Car Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---

[snip]

quoted

 .../bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt           | 87 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt

b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt new file
mode 100644
index 0000000000000000..92ddc0da7b755215

--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@

[snip]

quoted

+  - pm-domains: This node contains a hierarchy of PM Domain Nodes.

Can't it be an issue that the node happens to have the same name as the
standard pm-domains property ?

Scratch this, it's power-domains, not pm-domains, mybad.

quoted

+    Dependencies (e.g. parent SCUs should not be powered off while child
CPUs
+    are on) should be reflected using subnodes.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart