[PATCH/RFC v2 01/11] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for the R-Car System Controller
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
Date: 2016-02-18 14:38:26
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-renesas-soc
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:16:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
The Renesas R-Car System Controller provides power management for the
CPU cores and various coprocessors, following the generic PM domain
bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
This supports R-Car Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
Alternatives I considered:
- Using a single node per power register block, even if it contains
multiple domains, e.g.:
pd_ca15_scu: ca15_scu at 180 {
reg = <0x180 0x20>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
#power-domain-cells = <0>;
renesas,interrupt-bits = <12>;
pd_ca15_cpu: ca15_cpu at 40 {
reg = <0x40 0x20>;
#power-domain-cells = <1>;
renesas,pm-domain-indices = <0 1>;
renesas,pm-domain-names =
"ca15_cpu0", "ca15_cpu1";
renesas,interrupt-bits = <0 1>;
};
};
Notes:
- You cannot just have a property with the number of domains, as
index 0 is not used on R-Car H1. Hence the need for
"renesas,pm-domain-indices" and "renesas,interrupt-bits",
- "#power-domain-cells = <1>" for nodes with multiple domains,
which allows typos in "power-domains = <&pd_ca15_cpu n>", using
an invalid value of "n".
- Using a linear description in DT:
- Needs parent links for subdomains,
- More complicated to parse (lesson learned from R-Mobile PM
Domain support).
- Keeping the power register block offset and the bit number as separate
"reg" cells, increasing "#address-cells" from 2 to 3,
- Merging the interrupt bit (which needs only 5 bits) in the other "reg"
cell, decreasing "#address-cells" from 2 to 1.I think I'd move to not encoding mulitple things into reg. This seems like a bit of abuse of reg. Otherwise, I don't have much to comment on. Rob