Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 01/11] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for the R-Car System Controller
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date: 2016-02-15 23:33:30
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-renesas-soc
On Tuesday 16 February 2016 01:08:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 15 February 2016 22:16:50 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
The Renesas R-Car System Controller provides power management for the CPU cores and various coprocessors, following the generic PM domain bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt. This supports R-Car Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> ---
[snip]
quoted
.../bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt | 87 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txtb/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000..92ddc0da7b755215--- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
[snip]
quoted
+ - pm-domains: This node contains a hierarchy of PM Domain Nodes.Can't it be an issue that the node happens to have the same name as the standard pm-domains property ?
Scratch this, it's power-domains, not pm-domains, mybad.
quoted
+ Dependencies (e.g. parent SCUs should not be powered off while child CPUs + are on) should be reflected using subnodes.
-- Regards, Laurent Pinchart