Hi
On 5 February 2016 at 00:46, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/04/2016 08:37 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
quoted
Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
quoted
+static int sbsa_gwdt_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
quoted
+{
+ struct sbsa_gwdt *gwdt = to_sbsa_gwdt(wdd);
+
+ /*
+ * Writing WRR for an explicit watchdog refresh.
+ * You can write anyting(like 0xc0ffee).
+ */
+ writel(0xc0ffee, gwdt->refresh_base + SBSA_GWDT_WRR);
+
+ return 0;
+}
You might get in trouble for that. 0xd09f00d is probably less poisonous.
http://www.petpoisonhelpline.com/poison/caffeine/
Any reason why we can't just keep it simple and write 0?
+1
yes, we can, just "0" would be fine, will do.
Thanks :-)
Guenter
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021