Hi

On 5 February 2016 at 00:46, Guenter Roeck [off-list ref] wrote:

On 02/04/2016 08:37 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:

quoted

Will Deacon wrote:

quoted

quoted

+static int sbsa_gwdt_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd)

quoted

+{
+    struct sbsa_gwdt *gwdt = to_sbsa_gwdt(wdd);
+
+    /*
+    * Writing WRR for an explicit watchdog refresh.
+    * You can write anyting(like 0xc0ffee).
+    */
+    writel(0xc0ffee, gwdt->refresh_base + SBSA_GWDT_WRR);
+
+    return 0;
+}

You might get in trouble for that. 0xd09f00d is probably less poisonous.

http://www.petpoisonhelpline.com/poison/caffeine/

Any reason why we can't just keep it simple and write 0?

+1

yes, we can, just "0" would be fine, will do.

Thanks :-)

Guenter

-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021