[PATCH v4 10/16] phy: Add driver for rockchip Display Port PHY
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-02 13:27:46
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Yakir Yang [off-list ref] wrote:
This phy driver would control the Rockchip DisplayPort module phy clock and phy power, it is relate to analogix_dp-rockchip dp driver. If you want DP works rightly on rockchip platform, then you should select both of them. Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <redacted> --- Changes in v4: - Take Kishon suggest, add commit message, and remove the redundant rockchip_dp_phy_init() function, move those code to probe() method. And remove driver .owner number. Changes in v3: - Take Heiko suggest, add rockchip dp phy driver, collect the phy clocks and power control. Changes in v2: None .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt | 26 ++++
It is preferred that you split binding doc's from driver changes.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 + drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.cdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5de1088 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +Rockchip Soc Seroes Display Port PHY +------------------------------------ + +Required properties: +- compatible : should be one of the following supported values: + - "rockchip.rk3288-dp-phy" + +- reg : a list of registers used by phy driver
Please state the size of the list and order of what each entry if more than one.
+- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to dp clock. + of memory mapped region. +- clock-names: from common clock binding: + Required elements: "sclk_dp" "sclk_dp_24m" + +- rockchip,grf: this soc should set GRF regs, so need get grf here.
I have no idea what GRF means.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 0; + +Example: + +edp_phy: phy at ff770274 { + compatilble = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy"; + reg = <0xff770274 4>; + rockchip,grf = <&grf>; + clocks = <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>; + clock-names = "24m"; + #phy-cells = <0>; +}diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig index 47da573..8f2bc4f 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig@@ -310,6 +310,13 @@ config PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB help Enable this to support the Rockchip USB 2.0 PHY. +config PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP + tristate "Rockchip Display Port PHY Driver" + depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF + select GENERIC_PHY + help + Enable this to support the Rockchip Display Port PHY. + config PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY tristate "ST SPEAR1310-MIPHY driver" select GENERIC_PHYdiff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile index a5b18c1..e281f35 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP) += phy-rockchip-dp.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_IPQ806X_SATA) += phy-qcom-ipq806x-sata.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY) += phy-spear1310-miphy.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1340_MIPHY) += phy-spear1340-miphy.odiff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e9a726e --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +/* + * Rockchip DP PHY driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2015 FuZhou Rockchip Co., Ltd. + * Author: Yakir Yang <ykk@@rock-chips.com> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License. + */ + +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +#define GRF_SOC_CON12 0x0274 +#define GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER BIT(4) + +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN BIT(21) +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON 0 +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF BIT(5) + +struct rockchip_dp_phy { + struct device *dev; + struct regmap *grf; + void __iomem *regs; + struct clk *phy_24m; +}; + +static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp) +{ + int ret = 0; + + ret = clk_set_rate(dp->phy_24m, 24000000);
Do you need to do this every time? This can go in probe.
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot set clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(dp->phy_24m);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot enable clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp)
+{
+ clk_disable_unprepare(dp->phy_24m);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_set_phy_state(struct phy *phy, bool enable)
+{
+ struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+
+ if (enable) {
+ rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(dp);
+ writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON, dp->regs);
+ } else {
+ rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(dp);
+ writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF, dp->regs);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}I would just inline all 3 of these functions. The wrappers don't doesn't do anything, but add 2 levels of function calls.
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, true);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, false);
+}
+
+static struct phy_ops rockchip_dp_phy_ops = {
+ .power_on = rockchip_dp_phy_power_on,
+ .power_off = rockchip_dp_phy_power_off,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
+ struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp;
+ struct resource *res;
+ struct phy *phy;
+ int ret;
+
+ dp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (IS_ERR(dp))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ dp->dev = dev;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ dp->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->regs))
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->regs);
+
+ dp->phy_24m = devm_clk_get(dev, "24m");
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->phy_24m)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot get clock 24m\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->phy_24m);
+ }The binding says there are 2 clocks.
+
+ dp->grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->grf)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "rk3288-dp needs rockchip,grf property\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->grf);
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12,
+ GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER |
+ (GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER << 16));
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "Could not config GRF edp ref clk: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &rockchip_dp_phy_ops, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ }
+ phy_set_drvdata(phy, dp);
+
+ phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+
+ return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy" },
+ {}
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver rockchip_dp_phy_driver = {
+ .probe = rockchip_dp_phy_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "rockchip-dp-phy",
+ .of_match_table = rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids,
+ },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(rockchip_dp_phy_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Yakir Yang [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Rockchip DP PHY driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.1.2