Thread (153 messages) 153 messages, 15 authors, 2015-06-24

[PATCH v5 04/11] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for consumers

From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-18 12:56:38
Also in: linux-api, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml


On 16/06/15 23:29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 05/21/2015 09:43 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
quoted
@@ -379,6 +380,351 @@ int nvmem_unregister(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
[...]
quoted
+
+	return nvmem;
+}
+
+static int __nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
Why does this return int? It's not used anywhere.
I can remove it.
quoted
+{
+	module_put(nvmem->owner);
+	mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
+	nvmem->users--;
+	mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_cell_get_from_list(const char *cell_id)
+{
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell = NULL;
+	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
+
+	nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(NULL, &cell, cell_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
+		return (struct nvmem_cell *)nvmem;
ERR_CAST?
Will fix it.
quoted
+
+
+	return cell;
+
+}
+
+static struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(struct device_node *np,
+					    const char *name)
+{
+	struct device_node *cell_np, *nvmem_np;
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+	struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
+	const __be32 *addr;
+	int rval, len, index;
+
+	index = of_property_match_string(np, "nvmem-cell-names", name);
+
+	cell_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "nvmem-cell", index);
+	if (!cell_np)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	nvmem_np = of_get_next_parent(cell_np);
+	if (!nvmem_np)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np, NULL, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
+		return (struct nvmem_cell *)nvmem;
ERR_CAST?
Will fix it.
quoted
+
+	addr = of_get_property(cell_np, "reg", &len);
+	if (!addr || (len < 2 * sizeof(int))) {
+		dev_err(&nvmem->dev, "of_i2c: invalid reg on %s\n",
huh? of_i2c?
  :-)
Will fix it.
quoted
+
+	/* if it's not end on byte boundary */
+	if ((nbits + bit_offset) % BITS_PER_BYTE) {
+		/* setup the last byte with msb bits from nvmem */
+		rc = regmap_raw_read(nvmem->regmap,
+				    cell->offset + cell->bytes - 1, &v, 1);
+		*p |= GENMASK(7, (nbits + bit_offset) % BITS_PER_BYTE) & v;
+
+	}
+
+	return buf;
+}
+
+/**
+ * nvmem_cell_write(): Write to a given nvmem cell
This isn't kernel doc notation. It should be like

     nvmem_cell_write - Write to a given nvmem cell
Will fix as suggested by Sascha as

foobar() - short function description of foobar

Looks correct according to Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
quoted
+ *
+ * @cell: nvmem cell to be written.
+ * @buf: Buffer to be written.
+ * @len: length of buffer to be written to nvmem cell.
+ *
+ * The return value will be an length of bytes written or non zero on failure.
+ */
+int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, ssize_t len)
[..]
quoted
+
  static int nvmem_init(void)
  {
  	return class_register(&nvmem_class);
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3fa8c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * nvmem framework consumer.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
+ *
+ * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
+ * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_CONSUMER_H
+#define _LINUX_NVMEM_CONSUMER_H
+
+/* consumer cookie */
+struct nvmem_cell;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NVMEM)
+
+/* Cell based interface */
+struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_cell_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
We should probably forward declare struct device in this file too.
Yep I will do it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help