Quoting Marek Vasut (2015-02-10 14:07:51)

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 10:54:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

quoted

Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Wahren [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

thanks this is very helpful. I built the linux-next for my Duckbill and
add the SSP2 section from imx28-evk.dts into imx28-duckbill.dts.

Without my patch i get the following for HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0:

./memwatch -a 0x800401B0

0x800401b0: 0x5e5b5513

With my patch i get:

./memwatch -a 0x800401B0

0x800401b0: 0x5e1b5513

So it looks like a problem in my patch.

Yes, let's try to get the same value HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0.

quoted

I orded such a flash chip, but it will take some time until i can use it
with my hardware.

Thanks for doing this.

Maybe if you find out a way to fix the calculation of
HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0, then I can test it on my board.

Hi,

the difference is this 0x40 bit, right ? That's _STABLE bit, so it means
the clock are not stable, right ? Why would that happen in the first place?

Can you dump all the registers related to all of the clocks provided by
your clock driver, both with and without your patch? Then just diff
them. Might be more deltas than just this one register.

Regards,
Mike

Best regards,
Marek Vasut