[PATCH] gpio: mxs: implement get_direction callback
From: Richard Genoud <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-17 08:31:43
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-serial
Hi all, 2014-11-16 22:42 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-K?nig [off-list ref]:
Hello Janusz, On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 08:29:04PM +0100, Janusz U?ycki wrote:quoted
W dniu 2014-11-15 o 00:26, Uwe Kleine-K?nig pisze:quoted
Hello, On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Janusz Uzycki wrote:quoted
Function gpiod_get_direction() of gpiolib calls get_direction() callback. If chip doesn't implement it EINVAL error is returned. The function doesn't use for returned value shadowed FLAG_IS_OUT bit of gpio_desc.flags field so the callback is required.This sounds like a bugfix but "required" is wrong as AFAIR this call is optional and hardly used. Or did that change? The only drawback is that the debug output for (by Linux) uninitialized gpios is wrong.Yes, the callback is optional but gpiod_get_direction() doesn't work without it. gpiod_get_direction() doesn't seem optional, Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt: "A driver can also query the current direction of a GPIO: int gpiod_get_direction(const struct gpio_desc *desc) This function will return either GPIOF_DIR_IN or GPIOF_DIR_OUT. Be aware that there is no default direction for GPIOs. Therefore, **using a GPIO without setting its direction first is illegal and will result in undefined behavior!**" There is nothing about EINVAL error. It happens despite direction was set before. The reason is undefined get_direction callback.I still think you must not rely on gpiod_get_direction working. Some controllers might not be able to provide this info and if you know that the direction was set before, there is no need to ask the framework. (Although I admit it might be comfortable at times.)quoted
The commit f9e42397d79b6e810437ba1130b0b4b594f5e56c ("serial: mxs-auart: add interrupts for modem control lines") is based on Richard's commit ab5e4e4108ca5d8326cb6b4b3a21b096a002f68f ("tty/serial: at91: add interrupts for modem control lines"). Both patches use the condition: "if (gpiod && (gpiod_get_direction(gpiod) == GPIOF_DIR_IN))"This is broken. Actually you want to loop only over the functions in mctrl_gpios_desc that are inputs (i.e. CTS, DSR, DCD and RNG) and don't depend on the hardware state and/or a working gpiod_get_direction.
Yes, it seemed a convenient test to locate inputs in atmel_serial's
probe function.
But you're right, looping on a
enum mctrl_gpio_idx [] = {
UART_GPIO_CTS, UART_GPIO_DSR,
UART_GPIO_DCD, UART_GPIO_RNG, UART_GPIO_RI
};
Would better describe what is done, without using gpiod_get_direction().