Thread (269 messages) 269 messages, 18 authors, 2014-11-11

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-28 10:11:41
Also in: linux-fbdev

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:54:41AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:02:48PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Mike Turquette repeatedly said that he was against such a DT property:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/12/693
Mike says in that email that he's opposing the addition of a property
for clocks that is the equivalent of regulator-always-on. That's not
what this is about. If at all it'd be a property to mark a clock that
should not be disabled by default because it's essential.
It's just semantic. How is "a clock that should not be disabled by
default because it's essential" not a clock that stays always on?
Because a clock that should not be disabled by default can be turned off
when appropriate. A clock that is always on can't be turned off.
If a clock is essential, then it should never be disabled. Or we don't
share the same meaning of essential.
Essential for the particular use-case.
So, how would the clock driver would know about which use case we're
in? How would it know about which display engine is currently running?
How would it know about which video output is being set?

Currently, we have two separate display engines, which can each output
either to 4 different outputs (HDMI, RGB/LVDS, 2 DSI). Each and every
one of these combinations would require different clocks. What clocks
will we put in the driver? All of them?
Ideally the solution wouldn't involve hard-coding this into the clock
driver at all. There should be a way for firmware to communicate to the
kernel that a given clock shouldn't be disabled. Then since firmware
already knows what it set up it can tell the kernel to not touch those.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140828/6599c7b1/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help