Thread (269 messages) 269 messages, 18 authors, 2014-11-11

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code

From: jonsmirl at gmail.com <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-25 14:23:26
Also in: linux-fbdev

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Thierry Reding
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
quoted
On 08/25/2014 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:01:06PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:38:09AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
If not, perhaps the clock driver should force the clock to be
enabled (perhaps only if the DRM/KMS driver isn't enabled?).
I'm sorry, but I'm not going to take any code that will do that in our
clock driver.

I'm not going to have a huge list of ifdef depending on configuration
options to know which clock to enable, especially when clk_get should
have the consumer device as an argument.
Are you saying is that you want to solve a platform-specific problem by
pushing code into simple, generic drivers so that your platform code can
stay "clean"?
Are you saying that this driver would become "dirty" with such a patch?
Yes. Others have said the same and even provided alternative solutions
on how to solve what's seemingly a platform-specific problem in a
platform-specific way.
This is not platform specific, any platform with a complete clock driver
will suffer from the same problem (the clock driver disabling unclaimed
ahb gates, and thus killing the video output) if it wants to use simplefb
for early console support.
It is platform specific in that your platform may require certain clocks
to remain on. The next platform may require power domains to remain on
during boot and yet another one may rely on regulators to stay on during
boot. By your argument simplefb will need to be taught to handle pretty
much every type of resource that the kernel has.
Why can't simplefb be a driver library that is called from a device
specific device driver that only claims the clocks (or regulators)?
Then build all of these device specific drivers into the generic ARM
kernel. They will be quite small since all they do is claim the clocks
(or regulator).  Maybe we can even figure out some protocol for
removing the unused ones from memory later.

Later during the boot process the device specific driver can load its
KMS code which has also been implemented as a driver library. Maybe
use E_PROBE_DEFER to do this. Match on the device ID, claim the
clocks, defer until the full KMS library can be loaded.

quoted
As for the suggestion to simply never disable the plls / ahb gates by blocking
them from ever being disabled in the sunxi clock driver, that is not really
a solution either, as we want to be able to turn these things off to safe
power on screen blank once control has been turned over to the kms driver.
Then perhaps part of the hand-off procedure between simplefb and DRM/KMS
should involve marking PLLs or "gates" as properly managed.
quoted
And while at it let me also tackle the don't use simplefb only use kms argument,
that means that the clocks will be turned off until the kms module loads, which
will cause noticable screen flicker / video output resync, something which we've
been trying to get rid of for years now.

And no, build in the kms driver is not an answer either. That works nicely for
firmware, but not for generic Linux distributions supporting a wide range
of boards.
Odd... I didn't offer any of those two as solutions to the problem.

Thierry


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help