[RESEND PATCH v3 06/11] drm: add DT bindings documentation for atmel-hlcdc-dc driver
From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-21 12:56:26
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-pwm
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:33:21PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:15:16 +0200 Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:quoted
Hi Thierry, Oops, I missed this reply. On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:31:37 +0200 Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:06:19PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:quoted
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:05:43 +0200 Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 06:42:59PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt[...]quoted
+The Atmel HLCDC Display Controller is subdevice of the HLCDC MFD device. +See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-hlcdc.txt for more details.I think it's better to refer to these using relative filenames. When the device tree bindings are moved out of the kernel tree, they may no longer use the same hierarchy.Sure. By relative path you mean ../../mfd/atmel-hlcdc.txt or just mfd/atmel-hlcdc.txt ?I think the former is more explicit.Okay.quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ - atmel,panel: Should contain a phandle with 2 parameters. + The first cell is a phandle to a DRM panel device + The second cell encodes the RGB mode, which can take the following values: + * 0: RGB444 + * 1: RGB565 + * 2: RGB666 + * 3: RGB888These are properties of the panel and should be obtained from the panel directly rather than an additional cell in this specifier.Okay. What's the preferred way of doing this ? What about defining an rgb-mode property in the panel node.There's .bpc in struct drm_display_info, I suspect that it could be used for this. Alternatively, maybe we could extend the list of color formats that go into drm_display_info.color_formats? RGB444 is already covered.I don't think this color_formats field is intended to represent data stream format going through the bus. Moreover, AFAIU, RGB444 in this definition represent RGB 4:4:4 (chroma subsampling rate) and not 12 bits signals (4 bits for each color). Anyway I'll propose a patch series adding a new field to drm_display_info to encode the mediabus format (as discussed with Laurent and you).quoted
Also, like Laurent said, this shouldn't go into the device tree, since it's already implied by the panel's compatible value, so we'd be duplicating information.Again, this is not necessarily true (depending on your board design). One can decide to connect an RGB888 panel on an RGB666 bus and connect the missing pins to ground.I think in that case the board design itself could be considered as an RGB888 to RGB666 bridge, and I think that's what the device tree should be describing rather than a panel with a variable number of input formats.So, you're suggesting to add an RGB to RGB drm_bridge driver (and the appropriate DT bindings) to handle this case, right ?
Yes, exactly. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140721/1f75eb5f/attachment.sig>