[RESEND PATCH v3 06/11] drm: add DT bindings documentation for atmel-hlcdc-dc driver
From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-14 10:05:43
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-pwm
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 06:42:59PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
The Atmel HLCDC (HLCD Controller) IP available on some Atmel SoCs (i.e. at91sam9n12, at91sam9x5 family or sama5d3 family) provides a display controller device. The HLCDC block provides a single RGB output port, and only supports LCD panels connection to LCD panels for now. The atmel,panel property link the HLCDC RGB output with the LCD panel connected on this port (note that the HLCDC RGB connector implementation makes use of the DRM panel framework). Connection to other external devices (DRM bridges) might be added later by mean of a new atmel,xxx (atmel,bridge) property. Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt
This is the wrong directory. Device tree bindings describe hardware, but DRM is a Linux-specific framework. And yes, there are already files in that directory, I know, but that doesn't make it any better. I suggest either devicetree/bindings/gpu or devicetree/bindings/video.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/atmel-hlcdc-dc.txt
[...]
+The Atmel HLCDC Display Controller is subdevice of the HLCDC MFD device. +See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-hlcdc.txt for more details.
I think it's better to refer to these using relative filenames. When the device tree bindings are moved out of the kernel tree, they may no longer use the same hierarchy.
+Required properties: + - compatible: value should be one of the following: + "atmel,hlcdc-dc"
There's only one value, so perhaps: should be "atmel,hlcdc-dc".
+ - atmel,panel: Should contain a phandle with 2 parameters. + The first cell is a phandle to a DRM panel device + The second cell encodes the RGB mode, which can take the following values: + * 0: RGB444 + * 1: RGB565 + * 2: RGB666 + * 3: RGB888
These are properties of the panel and should be obtained from the panel directly rather than an additional cell in this specifier.
+ The third cell encodes specific flags describing LCD signals configuration + (see Atmel's datasheet for a full description of these fields): + * bit 0: HSPOL: Horizontal Synchronization Pulse Polarity + * bit 1: VSPOL: Vertical Synchronization Pulse Polarity + * bit 2: VSPDLYS: Vertical Synchronization Pulse Start + * bit 3: VSPDLYE: Vertical Synchronization Pulse End + * bit 4: DISPPOL: Display Signal Polarity + * bit 7: DISPDLY: LCD Controller Display Power Signal Synchronization + * bit 12: VSPSU: LCD Controller Vertical synchronization Pulse Setup Configuration + * bit 13: VSPHO: LCD Controller Vertical synchronization Pulse Hold Configuration + * bit 16-20: GUARDTIME: LCD DISPLAY Guard Time
Similarly for most of these: HSPOL and VSPOL seem to correspond to the
DRM_MODE_FLAG_{{P,N},{H,V}}SYNC flags in struct drm_display_mode. And
VSPDLYS as well as VSPDLYE sound like they may be vsync_start and
vsync_end of the same structure.
As for the others, maybe if you could explain what exactly they are we
may be able to find a better fit.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140714/b4cf2773/attachment.sig>