On 01/27/2014 10:54 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jyri Sarha [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 01/24/2014 07:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

...

quoted

I have not received too much feedback to my patch yet. CCF is a bit new
territory to me, but I think having a separate stackable clk-gpio would be
more flexible than having the gpio property implemented in clk-fixed-rate.

Not sure where stacking external clocks would be used, but sounds like a
fixed factor clock? Maybe you should add DT support to that if that's what
you need or have.

Ah, but then there is also the problem of having to change 
clk_register_fixed_rate() in the CCF api, which is called from all over 
the place.

Of course I could add a new clk_register_fixed_rate_gpio(), but still it 
does not look to me like the way to go.

Cheers,
Jyri