timeout is never < 0, so status = timeout is never getting run. This patch delete pointless
code. Could you show the regression? Thanks.
? 2012-11-15?17:57?Srinidhi Kasagar [off-list ref] ???
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
- if (timeout < 0) {
- dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
- "wait_for_completion_timeout "
- "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
- status = timeout;
- }
-
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
this code now.
regards/srinidhi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121115/0f1d0c0f/attachment-0001.html>