Thread (6 messages) read the whole thread 6 messages, 3 authors, 2012-11-15

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

From: Srinidhi Kasagar <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-15 08:50:42
Also in: linux-i2c, lkml

[...]
quoted hunk
From: Chuansheng Liu <redacted>
Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
To: linus.walleij at linaro.org, w.sang at pengutronix.de
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu at intel.com



The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
quoted
= 0 with unsigned int type.
So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <redacted>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
@@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
        timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
                &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);

-       if (timeout < 0) {
-               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
-                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
-                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
-               status = timeout;
-       }
-
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use

if (timeout == 0) {
 ...and the rest of the code as is
}

regards/srinidhi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help