On Tuesday 10 July 2012 07:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

* PGP Signed by an unknown key

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:29:06PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

quoted

Looked tps6586x-regulator driver and it has the platform data which
is regulator_init_data.
So for adding the vin-supply similar to what we have in fixed or
tps6591x regulator to pass through the desc.supply_name, we are not
having option here in platform data which can work for DT and non-DT
case.
So if still want to have the DT and non-DT case similar, we can add
one tps6586x_regulator_platform_data as

The supply names are not supposed to be conditional (I realise they are
for your current DT patch, I let that in because I just want to see an
end to all this DT stuff).

Sorry, I did not get it fully. I had two patches, one for fixed one and 
other for tps65910. On which patch, you are seeing issue and which part 
of code?
I like to fix it if it does not conform the DT or your expectation or 
any future enhancement which you are planning.
Little bit more details will help so that I will not repeat the same and 
fix it in my future patches.

Thanks,
Laxman