On 05/07/12 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
quoted
The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
DT and the non-DT case.
quoted
Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?
quoted
If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for _both_ DT
and !DT.
Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!
Well it seems silly of me just to copy Arnd's work. Do you want to
author and submit the patch to do this Arnd?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog