Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 5 authors, 2012-07-05

[PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-05 13:54:09
Also in: lkml

On 05/07/12 14:20, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
On 05/07/12 14:03, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Then were would you register it, if not here?
quoted
quoted
Same place as for DT.
quoted
That is a possibility, but the idea is to reduce code in the
platform area, not add to it. We'd also need a completely separate
But surely this would, if anything, remove code?  You already have the
code to do the registration in the MFD so all you're going to be doing
here is removing the code from
No, it will add platform code if we were to register the ab8500 from the 
platform area.
quoted
platform_data structure to the one we use for platform registration,
as much of it has now been moved into Device Tree. The regulators
are a good example of this, but there's also GPIO information which
is no longer relevant etc.
Hrm, the usual pattern for this stuff is that the DT is parsed into
platform data so the DT code is isolated to the parser.  It sounds like
you've got a very different structure here?
Yes we do. Ref that commit ID I sent you you a few days ago:

5f3fc8adeec9bb12742fbfa777fa1947deda21a2
quoted
I do believe that registering the AB8500 from the DB8500 is
appropriate though, for the simple reason that the AB8500 is a
sub-device to the DB8500. I think this is the correct thing to do.
But anyway, as I said before, that ship has sailed. We _already_ do
this. All this patch does is prevent the AB8500 from being
registered twice when DT is not enabled.
Well, it also introduces code into mainline which is likely to be used
as a template by other people - I'd be especially worried about the next
ST platform ending up repeating the same mistakes.
There are no mistakes. It would work for other platforms. :)
If the code is so
separate perhaps it's better to just remove the non-DT support?
That's the plan.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help