On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
DT and the non-DT case.
Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?
If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for _both_ DT
and !DT.
Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120705/33b512ca/attachment-0001.sig>