On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:53:54PM +0000, Ming Lei wrote:

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:27:19AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:

quoted

The OMAP-specific parts should be queued up in my/Beno?t's/Tony's trees,
rather than placed directly into -next. ?Otherwise they are likely to
generate merge conflicts with other OMAP changes that we may generate.

So I'd suggest splitting patches 1-3 off into a separate series that Will
can pass on to -next if he wishes.

Fine by me. If Ming Lei posts a new series so that everything is in one
thread then I can pick out the bits I want.

You mean the 3rd patch is the debugss patch posted by Benoit?
The original 3rd patch is not needed any more once the debugss patch
is taken.

Ah sorry, I lost track a bit. In that case, I'll just keep hold of the two
patches I have and deal with them appropriately.

Will