On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:27:19AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:

The OMAP-specific parts should be queued up in my/Beno?t's/Tony's trees, 
rather than placed directly into -next.  Otherwise they are likely to 
generate merge conflicts with other OMAP changes that we may generate.

So I'd suggest splitting patches 1-3 off into a separate series that Will 
can pass on to -next if he wishes.

Fine by me. If Ming Lei posts a new series so that everything is in one
thread then I can pick out the bits I want.

Cheers,

Will