[PATCH 1/5] ARM: gic: Add hooks for architecture specific extensions

-----Original Message-----
From: ccross at google.com [mailto:ccross at google.com] On Behalf Of
Colin Cross
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:23 PM
To: Santosh Shilimkar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
omap at vger.kernel.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com;
linux at arm.linux.org.uk; linus.ml.walleij at gmail.com; Russell King
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: gic: Add hooks for architecture
specific extensions

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: ccross at google.com [mailto:ccross at google.com] On Behalf Of
Colin Cross
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:54 PM
To: Santosh Shilimkar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
omap at vger.kernel.org; catalin.marinas at arm.com;
linux at arm.linux.org.uk; linus.ml.walleij at gmail.com; Russell King
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: gic: Add hooks for architecture
specific extensions

[....]

quoted

quoted

quoted

Great.
Can I fold below changes in my patch and add you ack and

tested-

quoted

quoted

by?

Sure

After reading your initial comment, you mentioned you need to have
'gic_set_type' as well. Is this still true. If yes then we need to
have arch_extn call for that as well.

You are right, I missed adding the extension for gic_set_type.  My
testing doesn't cover that case right now, because I don't have any
drivers updated to linux-next that use a wake source that is
compatible with Tegra's lowest power suspend mode, and that is the
only time the extension to gic_set_type is necessary.

Ok.
So I will go ahead and add an extension for the same so that we have
most of the usecases covered.

Regards,
Santosh